On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Diane Holt wrote: > I know I shouldn't even say this, given the last <javac> change discussion > we just went thru :) -- but... is there any chance of adding a "keepgoing" > attribute to <javac>? I just purposely ran an incremental build I knew > should get compiler errors, hoping I'd see all the source files that > needed changing (due to the change that was made that was guaranteed to > break them), but I only got to see the first one. I think having a > keepgoing attribute for the compiles would be really handy. (It looks like > it could be a pretty straightforward thing to add -- I just don't think > I'm the one to try and add it. :)
It depends on the underlying java compiler. If mean a keepgoing at a target level then there has been requests for that and it will most likely eventually wind up in ant :P Cheers, Pete *--------------------------------------------------* | Latrobe University, | Does the name 'Pavlov' | | Bundoora, Australia | ring a bell ? | *--------------------------------------------------*
