>>>>> "CM" == Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CM> Nico, >> The behaviour is slightly different from target, since >> empty properties (equal to "") are handled as if they don't exist. CM> I would prefer this behaviour not to be different as it may cause CM> "surprises". Yes, all if/unless attributes should behave the same (target is not alone with its interpretation, take a look at PatternSet.NameEntry or JUnitTest). What kind of use case would be satisfied by treating empty properties similar to those that don't exist? I think the current concept is quite clear. Stefan
