Fair enough. I'm happy with an attribute, and I'm happy with NOT copying empty dirs being the default, since that is the current behavior everyone is used to. That way nothing breaks....
Thanks for your answer. -ken Glenn McAllister wrote: > > Fair enough. The likely answer is yes, but I may make it configurable with > an attribute. In fact, I probably will. The only question left is which > is the default behaviour? To include or not to include? > > Glenn McAllister > Software Developer. IBM Toronto Lab, (416) 448-3805 > "An approximate answer to the right question is better than the > right answer to the wrong question." - John W. Tukey > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: Re: Copydir question - empty directories... > > But, you never answered the question - while doing this > work, are you going to fix the copy so it copies > empty directories...? > > Glenn McAllister wrote: > > > > I just got my access last night, but I have yet to do anything with it. > > Its a case of too much to do with too little time, as my spare time has > > been filled with house hunting and writing an article about using Ant > > inside VisualAge for Java on Linux. > > > > I'm hoping to get the chance to look at things later today or early > > tonight. I wouldn't expect to see the new copy/delete/move tasks in > place > > before Thursday or Friday though - just 'cause I'm sure I'm going to do > > something wrong over the next couple of days. :-) > > > > Glenn McAllister > > Software Developer. IBM Toronto Lab, (416) 448-3805 > > "An approximate answer to the right question is better than the > > right answer to the wrong question." - John W. Tukey > > > >
