>>>>> "JAF" == Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JAF> <property name="a" value="x" /> or <property name="b" file="a JAF> file name" /> Looks more like the semantics of <variable> (the one nested into <env>) would be useful. JAF> Do you think the name is problematic? At least it would be problematic for a DTD, we should not have ELEMENTS of the same name but implemented by different classes. Stefan
