> We could always keep it backwards compatible for one release by > keeping the methods and constructors with Project arguments - and I > wouldn't want to drop them anyway because you sometimes want to > specify a project other than the current one (the <ant> task for > example). > > Stefan
My submission did not modify the interface to Task, only to DataType. The compatibility problems I was refering to stem from the use of classes derived from DataType in a task. I also understand that while my patch would have been easy to apply a week ago, it is getting increasingly difficult as new code is added to the baseline (although I am willing to submit a new patch if so requested). Anyway, it looks like the decision has been made, and I'll have to wait. Vincent. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
