I'm more than happy to move to an auto-generated format fairly quickly once we get by release 1.2. I just figured that the current style was getting a bit unworkable/unreadable, so I'd take a first stab a cleaning things up.
Should I back off on this, then, and just wait till after 1.2? If I make a major change now, and then have to redo it all to suit some automated process, how much thrashing will that cause in CVS? I'm happy to continue, but I guess I'd like to have a better feel for the implications before I commit anything. P.S. I prefer .html too. I was using FrontPage to do some of this stuff more quickly, and it defaults to using .htm. I'll fix that. Glenn McAllister Software Developer. IBM Toronto Lab, (416) 448-3805 "An approximate answer to the right question is better than the right answer to the wrong question." - John W. Tukey Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: New doc format and organization >>>>> "GM" == Glenn McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GM> So, I've gone for a more LDP format that has a primary table of GM> contents, with navigation links from one page to the next. This is almost calling for docbook or stylebook - and I wouldn't mind going into that direction. So, yes, I like it as an interim solution (the HTML files) but would prefer to autogenerate the HTML at a later point. GM> Now, I don't like this format as it introduces some maintenance GM> headaches. Obviously, most Next and Prev links are broken 8-). GM> Also, how do people feel about CSS? Even javadoc uses CSS (JDK 1.2+ that is) so I think we could do so as well. Stefan PS: I'd prefer .html over .htm
