Something like 'ant:' would seem a sensible namespace.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 October 2000 19:08 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: documenting your build file > > I'll second that. > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Kohler [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 10:54 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: documenting your build file > > > I would recommend using namespaces. (If the build.xml does not now > use a namespace, it would be a very good Idea to add it.) > > > <project > xmlns=" <http://www.apache.org/schema/Ant>" > xmlns:doc=" <http://www.apache.org/schema/AntDoc>" > default="package" basedir="."> > > <target name="init"> > <doc:descr>some description goes here</doc:descr> > <tstamp/> > ... > </target> > > ... > > The Ant parser would simply ignore any tags not in its > own namespace. If you do this with namespaces, then ANY > XML language (eg. XLink, RDF) could be embedded within > the build files. >
