Simeon Fitch wrote:
> I think the real argument for this is speed. If it > will make loading and running Ant faster I think it > should be considered. My builds with Ant are still > much slower than they were with make. > Wow, that really stunned me! I moved our stuff from an Imakefile/Makefile based system to Ant, and saw great improvement. One part of our system used to take 1 hr 15min to compile in the Makefile based system, and takes 7 minutes to compile using Ant. It has 2158 source files...
