>>>>> "DH" == Diane Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DH> we might as well add in property-expansion so using this ENTITY DH> stuff could be (in my opinion) more useful. I agree it could be made more powerful this way. My problem with it is something different: (1) ENTITY is part of the whole DTD legacy XML is still carrying around. IMHO we should be using XSchema and XInclude instead of DTDs and ENTITY as soon as all parsers support this. (2) IMHO we'd be mixing the concerns of the XML parser and Ant when interfering with the ENTITY resolution that way. I could be convinced to extend the code along the lines you suggest, I just don't feel well with it. Don't know, a matter of taste, purism, something like that. Stefan
