Stefan Bodewig wrote on 11/8/00 1:22 am:
>>>>>> "EM" == Erik Meade
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>writes:
>
> EM> Is there any reason not
>to allow multiple
>classpathrefs separated
>EM> by commas? I would
>like to be able to reuse
>individual classrefs EM>
>together without having to
>define all the combinations.
>
>You can use nested classpath
>elements instead. IMHO
>whenever you feel need to
>give a list of things you
>should use nested elements.
>Your proposal would prohibit
>IDs containing a comma.
>
>Stefan
Yes, this sounds good.
I got the results I wanted by doing:
<path id="ext.jars">
<fileset dir="${ext.dir}" >
<include name="**/*.jar" />
</fileset >
</path>
<path id="weblogic.jars">
<fileset dir="${weblogic.dir}" >
<include name="**/*.jar" />
<include name="**/*.zip" />
</fileset >
</path>
and then in my Javac tasks:
<classpath>
<path refid="ext.jars" />
<path refid="weblogic.jars" />
</classpath>
Thanks,
Erik