I'm not sure about this case. I do things that are a bit more specific, like include name="a/b/**/*.java exclude name="a/b/**/test/*
And it works fine. Peter Donald wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed that multiple patterns in include/exclude do not work > anymore. I also notice that there seeems to be broken behaviour in some > include/exclude operations. > > I missed the reason why multiple patterns were removed - can someone > enlighten me ? ;) I use to use them all the time for constructs like > "com/biz/*/**". Now I tried to get around this by using an include of > "com/biz/**" and an exclude of "com/biz/*" but that doesn't seem to work > either. This is a bug right from what I understand ? > > Cheers, > > Pete > > *------------------------------------------------------* > | "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want | > | to test a man's character, give him power." | > | -Abraham Lincoln | > *------------------------------------------------------*
