Wolf Siberski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that this is trying to be a theoretical discussion of > the rules. I don't have any opinion on the jar file issue.
Thank you, Wolf. My aim was to discuss it on this abstract level, that's why I changed the subject in the first place. I've seen the same dilemma that you describe - and couldn't come up with another conclusion but "the vetoer wins" either. Stefan
