Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Someone mentioned the "id" space has to be local to the project by >> definition of the ID semantic in XML. > > That was Stefan. I think we can change that since we have never > published a DTD :-) That is, I don't think we have ever officially > designated the id attribute as an ID.
It turned out that way - and I'm not sure whether I've pushed it into that direction with the antstructure task. Actually I have no problem by dropping any connection to the XML ID/IDREF mechanism and am all for one single unified namespace for properties and references. Stefan
