On 12/6/00 1:51 AM, "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
> 
> It would be very very useful to integrate it for those poor souls who don't
> choose to use jikes ;) I would like to see Javac to become a facade for
> lower level compilers. ie - instead of having logic for jikes/javac
> modern/javac classic/microsoft/gnu/symantec compilers we should instead
> place the code for these in seperate places and effectively pass them a
> hashmap of properties post resolution in javac task. So once
> classpath/bootpath is resolved and any dependencies zapped we should pass
> the hashmap with something like

Righto. I totally agree with you on that. The Javac task would be, in
effect, several (on the order of 10 or so) class files by doing that, but
that would be fine by me if we had a better way of managing all these
options.



-- 
James Duncan Davidson                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                                                  !try; do()

Reply via email to