On 12/8/00 5:15 AM, "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Simply forcing Task authors to provide getters may be good enough. This
> can be
>> validated at parse time (in IntrospectionHelper) for enforcement.
>
> dunno about enforcement. Kind of strict that. But it could be made part of
> the requirements to get your task included into the cvs tree.
Its not needed if the underlying data model is exposed the right way. Done
the way it is in AntEater, there is no need to make this restriction.
--
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
