At 12:02 11/12/00 +1030, Barrie Treloar wrote: >On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Mariusz Nowostawski wrote: > >> But should those "interfaces" being kept in ANT core, or should they be >> kept in seperate, optional tasks repository? For javac, it should be kept >[del] > >> I prefer a central repository and "unification factory" for optional >> tasks, which could take care of defining those "interfaces", and which >> could keep track of all the optional tasks. The only exception would be >> javac being part of the core. > >I think you will find that most people would say that "javac" is not >part of core. > >The way core has been described, IIRC, > Project, > Task, > Target, > Property.
Or alternatively ;) Core= Project + Target + task Core Tasks= Property + Taskdef Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
