Alex Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's a valid point, though I can definitely see this either > way. If Ant supported the prefix and/or fullpath attributes on all > tasks where it made sense (e.g. copy and move), would you still > object?
Does it make sense in copy? All use cases I can come up, something like <copy todir="target"> <fileset dir="src1" /> <prefixedfileset dir="src2" prefix="inner/" /> </copy> would be better suited and more readable by two separate <copy> tasks IMHO. <copy todir="target"> <fileset dir="src1" /> </copy> <mkdir dir="target/innner" /> <copy todir="target/inner"> <fileset dir="src2" /> </copy> > In any case, with Pete's latest change, both <filesets> and > <prefixedfilesets> can have these extra attributes in Zip > tasks. Thats because I was not paying attention 8-). addFileset should have a plain FileSet as its argument IMHO. Stefan
