At 09:05 17/12/00 -0800, James Duncan Davidson wrote: >> 1. a stable Project-Target-Task object hierarchy (although these should really >> be defined interfaces, not classes). > >There's enough functionality that can be implemented in Project, Target, and >Task to merit them being classes. And, since it's not expected that there >will be multiple differing implementations of Project, Target, and Task
Theres been requests for it. Quite a few - mainly with respect for adding extra gee-whiz functionality that should NOT be in core but would be useful for integration into GUIs/IDEs. Like keeping comments and raising property change/veto events etc. Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
