On 12/13/00 2:00 AM, "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not really. I do see valid use cases for setting project's basedir
> based on user.home for example.
I didn't think that ${}'s reflected system.properties. Or at least they did
when I wrote it, then it was pulled. Was that put back in?
>> I see much much danger in evaluating depends attributes.
>
> If we were going to expand them at runtime that is, right. Actually I
> was proposing to expand them at parser time - should have been
> clearer.
If expanded at parser time, then I'd be for this. But since in AntEater,
it's all deferred so that scripts and what not can modify them, then I'm
against.
>> Besides the fact that has been asked for can you think of any good
>> reasons to include it?
>
> Consistency.
But at the expense of other consistency.
--
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
