On 11/29/00 2:27 AM, "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We'll have to agree that we disagree. IMHO CJAN should use Ant, but
> not be integrated into Ant. It's yet another frontend for Ant like
> Antidote is and like the others that have been proposed when Duncan
> shared his vision of AntEater.
I'm not sure I see CJAN as a front end, or just another thing to be
manipulated as a Task. As a Task, it's pretty simple to invision putting a
cjan-ensure target in that executes some tasks that make sure that the right
libs are in place.
.duncan
--
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
