James Duncan Davidson wrote: > > However, that doesn't change my core assertion > that I've got as much a rightto be here as anyone
+1 > and that I think I've got a right to Ant's "vision > thing". Other visions are fine, but they aren't > Ant imo. If you are implying an exclusive right: -1. Ant's vision is now community property. IMHO, at the moment, you have a claim to the rights to "AntEater". Other proposals are fine, but they aren't AntEater. Nor, for that matter, are *ANY* of the proposals Ant - yet. - Sam Ruby
