It would probably be best to "join", then...

Sorry.

-----Original Message-----
From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 8:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Wait and Available (Updated)


From: "James Duncan Davidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 1/2/01 4:39 AM, "Thomas Christen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hopfully this sounds not impatient,
> >
> > I'd like to ask if there is anybody intersted in my two
> > enhancements/extension
> > (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=97587019310230&w=2) or
should I
> > stop asking ?
>
> Actually, in the next draft of the Ant 2.0 proposal that I'll get up
tonight
> (assuming I don't fall asleep like I did last night :) is a take on
> multithreading of tasks as part of the base Ant engine in an easy and
native
> way that adds very little overhead to the antfile syntax.
>

He probably can't "wait" till that is "available".

Sorry, terrible joke - couldn't resist.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to