On 1/2/01 4:29 PM, "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tend to use this.blah only when blah by itself would be ambiguous. This is
> usually the case in the setter for blah and perhaps a constructor in which a
> value for blah is passed.
Yep. That's about where I stand as well. "this." is great when you need it,
and 5 extra characters to get in the way when you don't.
--
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
