At 10:26 11/1/01 -0800, James Duncan Davidson wrote: >I disagree that we need a way to say that a property is immutable.
I am not sure you handle things like commandline overides, other static defines (like compiler) etc. >Also, with breaking things into workspace/module as the current docs that >I've put up suggest, the properties are scoped well enough not to have the >inheritance problem. The workspace/module is only two levels. this may be satisfactory for small to medium projects but definetly doesn't cover all cases and thus I believe we still need inheritance. Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
