At 05:19 12/1/01 -0800, James Duncan Davidson wrote: >On 1/12/01 3:59 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> on 1/12/01 3:19 PM, "James Duncan Davidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Turns out that there are ways to limit attachments. And we can do it based >>> on mime type. As long as we don�t remove text/plain from things, we should >>> be cool with patches. >>> >>> -- >>> James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> !try; do() >> >> Uh. What if someone sends updated .html documentation that includes new >> files? Would it be marked as text/plain? > >Durn. That cinches it -- they would be stripped if we set things up to strip >them. Guess we'll just have to rely upon community pressure to take care of >things.
ahh no patches would go through as normal text/plain - regardless of content. The only thing it would block is attaching html documents. Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
