I think I agree ;) At 10:56 14/1/01 -0500, Roger Vaughn wrote: >Darned if this isn't the best proposal I've yet heard to answer this >long-running question. > >+1 > > >Diane Holt wrote: > >> --- James Duncan Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > If we go Workspace/Module -- >> >> Is "Module" defined as the current buildfile? >> >> Also, instead of having two separate tags to set a property, couldn't we >> just (I think something like this might have even been suggested before) >> add some attributes to <property>: >> scope="global | module | target" >> static="yes | no" >> where: >> global = workspace-wide (carried into calls to sub-buildfiles) >> module = current buildfile only (any file "include"d gets these as well) >> target = current target only >> static = immutable or mutable >> >> The buildfile writer decides which to make what, based on the logic of how >> they put the put the build together. >> >> Diane >> >> ===== >> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cheers,
Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
