on 1/18/01 11:32 AM, "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I correct in my belief that were a java style ant task to be made part > of the Java style distribution, and not ant, there would be no issues? 100%. > If that were the the case then the solution to the problem would be "add the > ant task to the style libraries" and be done with it. Same for some means of > invoking ant from within Jedit. (has anyone scripted that yet?) Yes. I agree...in fact, this brings up the issues of which tasks should be included with Ant and which shouldn't...If project == OSS, then I personally feel that tasks should belong closest with their projects... -jon
