I was going to raise the same concern. Our builds of one particular project dropped from over on hour to 7 minutes using Ant. I'd hate to see classloader overhead bring that back to 1 hour build time...
Marvin Greenberg wrote: > There may be performance implications to this or > forking javac. As I understand it, you get a > significant performance benefit by loading all > the javac classes once. If this memory leak is > a real problem, it seems it is a javac bug. Does > Jikes behave sililarly? > > Marvin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nick Reeves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 7:54 AM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: Object retention problem with javac > > > > > > Will try AntClassLoader and let you know. > > > > > > > > A start would be to modify one of the Javac?? classes in the > > > .../taskdefs/compilers directory to load the compiler class via an > > > AntClassLoader instance. Could you give it a try and report back to > > > us? > > > > > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
