on 1/22/01 12:37 PM, "Glenn McAllister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Care to help define that better solution? :-) I thought I did. > I'm happy to back out the change and I'll do it now, but I'd like some input > as to a better solution. > > Glenn McAllister There is already directory scanning code (or there used to be) that autoexcludes a number of items such as "CVS, .cvsignore, etc..." Why can't you use that? I guess my point is and my complaint is that CVS is not going to be our only revision control software (see: <http://subversion.tigris.org/>) and making special cases for a directory called "CVS" all over the code is really bad as when tools like Subversion are ready, you will now have "SVN" as a directory name. It should be centralized somewhere. How you do the centralization is up to you and this group to decide. :-) -jon -- Honk if you love peace and quiet.
