Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what if we extended BuildListener so that it had the callbacks > > void taskFailed( BuildException be ); > void taskError( Throwable t );
Yep, much less cumbersome than checking for a thrown exception in buildFinished. +1 > Now the default implementation would just rethrow the exception and > thinks would operate 100% like they do now but other implementations > could choose to "consume" the error and keep going on. Just a > thought - thoughts ? Sounds OK to me. Not exactly the type of functionality one would expect from a pure Listener, but as we move towards a "FrontEnd" or something this seems the appropriate place. Stefan
