Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:03 30/1/01 +0100, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >>when Don's ZipFileSet stuff has been committed I complained about >>some things but nobody responded. As I'm not sure anybody has read >>that mail, I'll give you a heads up as I'm going to address the >>problem as I see it myself. > > I missed it and IIRC I was the one who commited the change - soz ;)
no problem Pete, just wanted to make sure you were aware of my plans. >>* add <zipfileset> for the new functionality. > > -0 looks like the best choice ATM. > Though what does a zipfileset have to do with adding a prefix to > files added ;) This is something I've already asked myself ;-) > I would like to change it to use mapper and have a <mapped-fileset> > or <transformed-fileset> or something similar but I don't have the > time to do it at the moment so .. ;) I don't have the time either - at least not for Ant 1.3. What does a <mapper> have to do with treating zip file entries like directories 8-)? Stefan
