> Alternatively you could help us work on Ant2.x which will almost ......
OK, sign me up :-) > [..myrmdion..] OK, I'll read the docs for that. It sure sounds interesting and it looks like I have some concepts to absorb. > Other than that all the names/packages are yet to be finalised and may > change (a few people pointed out they dislike the name "tasklet" but no one > on ant-dev has commented). Does tasklet imply that a built ant.jar and optional.jar will not contain all taskdefs. And that taskefs may be delivered as separate tasklets that can be dropped into a disrectory to enable ant to use them? +1 > I keep meaning to hack on it some more but every time I get some spare time > the sun is shining outside ... and my area isn't usually known for good > weather so ... ;) Paul gazes out of window. Rain again! > I say good, better, great - another vote for embeddable Ant2.0 ;) Yup, if it's everything you say it is, then I'm +1 for it. Regards, - Paul H _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
