Should I have assigned a Bugzilla to the problem first? d
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:16:45 -0500, Bill Burton wrote: >Hello, > >Could one of the committers please pick up this patch? It should really >go into 1.3. I worked out a similar fix just before code freeze but this >patch is simpler than mine for the Win 9x part of the fix. > >Thanks, >-Bill Burton > >David Rees wrote: >> >> <This is a resend. I originally accidently sent it as a reply to >> completely different thread so it may have been missed.> >> >> Two patches attached. >> >> Combined they correct Execute (and hence the java task and perhaps >> others) when the execute directory's drive is different than the >> current directory's drive. Pre-patch the drive change doesn't happen >> so the execute runs in a current directory. The first patch fixes it >> for NT/2K and the second one fixes it (via a BAT file change) for >> 9X/ME. >> >> As an example, if your current directory is c:\build and your run >> directory is d:\run, previously only a "cd d:\run" was performed and >> the active drive was not changed (because of the Windows directory per >> drive "feature"). Therefore the execute actually still runs in >> c:\build. The patches cause the needed active drive change as well. >> >> dave >> >> PS, May need additional testing on all the Win9X/ME variations. I >> don't have all them available to run the tests. >> >> PS II, I assume I don't need to raise a bug if I just supply the patch >> - right? > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
