At 07:43 21/2/01 +0100, Christoph Wilhelms wrote: >Am I missing something? I always thought the depending targets will be >executed in the order they have been entered like:
they will be in the current implementation (and all the proposals) but this is not necessarily so by design. Especially when start allowing multi-threading. Depends are meant to list all dependencies and thus logically are unordered data type ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
