http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=843

*** shadow/843  Mon Mar  5 09:13:07 2001
--- shadow/843.tmp.9402 Mon Mar  5 16:00:39 2001
***************
*** 2,11 ****
  | Ant task carries over property values from previous ant call               |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 843                         Product: Ant                     |
! |       Status: NEW                         Version: 1.3                     |
! |   Resolution:                            Platform: PC                      |
  |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: Windows NT/2K           |
! |     Priority:                           Component: Core tasks              |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |  Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   |
  |  Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                           |
--- 2,11 ----
  | Ant task carries over property values from previous ant call               |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 843                         Product: Ant                     |
! |       Status: RESOLVED                    Version: 1.3                     |
! |   Resolution: INVALID                    Platform: PC                      |
  |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: Windows NT/2K           |
! |     Priority: High                      Component: Core tasks              |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |  Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   |
  |  Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                           |
***************
*** 52,55 ****
  
  I would expect that it would display the following instead:
  
! [echo] antfile: build2.xml
--- 52,58 ----
  
  I would expect that it would display the following instead:
  
! [echo] antfile: build2.xml
! 
! ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-03-05 16:00 -------
! Not a bug - didn't read documentation close enough.

Reply via email to