On 09 Mar 2001 10:56:04 +0100, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Why keep code-level compatibility? Who will be calling it at that >> level? > >People writing tasks? >
Just to be clear, the reason I am asking is to understand the "usecases" I need to consider when working on Ant code . I didn't mean to imply it was a bad idea. That said, the method he was trying to preserve was setWhenempty. When would a task writer be using this? Somehow creating a task to reuse internally (which I certain could imagine)? d --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
