At 09:54 28/3/01 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> At 12:09 27/3/01 -0700, STEARNS,JIM (HP-FtCollins,ex1) wrote: >>>OK, I grant you that after Step 2, deleting ant\lib\parser.java >>>would have been the smart move, a little less intrusive than >>>modifying bin\lcp.bat. But I'll have to remember to do that >>>deletion every time I update ant binaries. >> >> which is one of the reasons I don't think crimson should be packaged >> with ant > >This is the very same reason why junit.jar shouldn't be packaged with >Ant as I might already have a different version of it in my >CLASSPATH. No, I don't want to start the jars in CVS thread again >... ;-)
I was talking about the distribution rather than the CVS - while I would prefer 0 jars in CVS until we have CJAN in place it is not practical/easy. Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
