At 02:01  29/3/01 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>The stuff that didn't get enough - or negative - votes in the first
>pass.
>
>>> * make properties fully dynamic, i.e. allow their value to be
>>> * reassigned
>
>Glenn McAllister wrote:
>
>> +1 if we have scoping.
>
>Conor MacNeill wrote:
>
>> They already are - just not by <property>. I still want command line
>> override so either need scoping or an overall control system such as
>> build.sysclasspath or whatever that is called.

I thought they were only fully dynamic on first pass of a task - ie on
subsequent invocations of same task the properties have already been
interpreted ???

Cheers,

Pete

*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |
*-----------------------------------------------------*

Reply via email to