Glenn McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> * tasks should have access to its own XML representation. > > As Peter said, replace the phrase "XML representation" with "Task > Object Model", and I'll +1 this.
And what would this TOM be? Tasks already have access to all attributes and all child elements. Are you talking about a more generic interface to access them like "Map getAttributes()" or "List getChildern()"? How and under what circumstances would a task benefit from it? Stefan
