At 06:36 2/4/01 +1000, Peter Donald wrote: >At 10:23 2/4/01 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >>Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>>* a built-in mechanism to include build-file fragments - something >>>> that doesn't use SYSTEM entities at all and therefore is XSchema >>>> friendly, allows for property expansions ... >>> >>> -1 >>> Not needed as far as I can see given templating/scoping. >> >> >>Let's say templating doesn't make it into the core, how would scoping >>solve the "I want to include an XML snippet but not use a DOCTYPE >>decl"? >> >>Importing from other projects might be an option. > >Yep - if templating does not make it in (but I am sure at least xslt >templating will) then I would +1 an include/import (aswell as those >antapply/javapply tasks).
Let me rephrase that - if sufficently versatile templating doesn't make static templating a viable option then I don't mind java/ant-apply. (Because isn't import/include just a specialised static templating rule). Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
