Diane Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I always assumed that the order in which you specified the targets > in the "depends" attribute was in fact the sequence in which they > were executed, and when I run targets that have a list of > dependencies, I've never seen it not execute them in that order -- > has that just been luck?
Maybe, or maybe not, as this is what the current implementation does, after calculating dependencies of course. In depends="a,b" a will obviously execute a after b if b depends on a. Stefan