Diane Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I always assumed that the order in which you specified the targets
> in the "depends" attribute was in fact the sequence in which they
> were executed, and when I run targets that have a list of
> dependencies, I've never seen it not execute them in that order --
> has that just been luck?

Maybe, or maybe not, as this is what the current implementation does,
after calculating dependencies of course. In depends="a,b" a will
obviously execute a after b if b depends on a.

Stefan

Reply via email to