At 10:33 3/4/01 +0100, Les Hughes wrote: >It was pretty obvious that you guys had other things on your minds recently >but when can we expect to see new 1.x tasks making it into CVS - once all of >the discussion is over maybe?
as soon as something gets enough votes. I only personally use a small subset of ant tasks and thus don't really feel confident about checking in changes without someone else checking it. Whenever I ask for other people to check it no one does ... hence it doesn't get added ;) >In my case, I'm waiting on a decision on <ear> If you want it then I will add it in but there was concern that it is no longer needed. Resend it and if no one -1s it then I will check it in. >and more importantly, Kirk's <p4counter>. no idea about that ;) >Also, I was wondering will 'old' 1.x tasks will need to be ported to 2.x >sometime in the not to distant future? I would more say "distant" future as we haven't even got into design phase of ant2 so ... ;) >I'd like to start thinking about >cleaning up the P4 stuff, in particular around the use (or not) of Oro for >regexp matching in p4base but I'd rather wait for the 2.x framework to be a >little firmer before starting if it'll require task re-writes. rewrite it now if you want ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
