On Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:41:56 -0400, Eric Siegerman wrote: >On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:14:30AM +1000, Peter Donald wrote: >> If it was just us then that would be fine but to be honest we don't know >> who else has extended the classes and how they did it (and many have). Thus >> changing something that will break their builds is probably not a good thing. > >I hadn't thought of that. Ok, I'm convinced. Thanks.
Are you still going to resubmit with just a simpler patch to the static match method? Based on your earlier comments it sounds like a pretty useful change. d
