Tim Vernum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 08:29 17/4/01 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote: > >>> >> * make the default logger's output clear, informative, >>> >> and terse. > >> Still -1. > > Out of interest, is it the "clear" , "informative" or "terse" > bit that you don't like?
As I've seconded Conor's -1 now: I don't like the implication that the current logger wasn't clear, informative or terse in this statement. Basically, I want to keep the old default behavior. Stefan
