At 09:03  23/4/01 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>We are sure not making things easy here, oh my ...
>
>I needed three types of results, accepted, rejected and semi-rejected.
>If I count in Glenn's vote in the DISC thread, which he didn't recast
>in the [VOTE] one, the three semi-rejected items get the third +1 they
>need.
>
>Anybody want to help me here, how close we need to stick to our rules?

As long as the items aren't -1ed and whoever implements it is willing to
support there shouldn't be an issue IMHO ;)

Cheers,

Pete

*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |
*-----------------------------------------------------*

Reply via email to