http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1478
*** shadow/1478 Tue Apr 24 08:53:17 2001
--- shadow/1478.tmp.16239 Tue Apr 24 08:53:17 2001
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,67 ----
+ +============================================================================+
+ | EJBC - Wildcard Resolution |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ | Bug #: 1478 Product: Ant |
+ | Status: NEW Version: 1.3 |
+ | Resolution: Platform: PC |
+ | Severity: Major OS/Version: |
+ | Priority: Component: Optional Tasks |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ | Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+ | Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ | URL: |
+ +============================================================================+
+ | DESCRIPTION |
+ I believe I've resolved this problem. In Mark's case at least, it appears
that
+ wildcard resolution is faulty for a fileset like this:
+
+ <target name="ejbc" depends="compile">
+ <ejbjar srcdir="${compile.home}"
+ destdir="${build.ear}"
+ descriptordir="${compile.home}/META-INF" >
+ <weblogic destdir="${build.ear}"
+ classpath="${app.classpath}"
+ keepgeneric="false"
+ suffix=".jar"/>
+ <include name="**/*ejb-jar.xml" />
+ <exclude name="**/*weblogic-ejb-jar.xml, **/*weblogic-cmp-
+ rdbmsjar.xml" />
+ </ejbjar>
+ </target>
+
+
+ but is ok for a fileset like this:
+
+
+ <target name="ejbc" depends="compile">
+ <ejbjar srcdir="${compile.home}"
+ destdir="${build.ear}"
+ descriptordir="${compile.home}/META-INF" >
+ <weblogic destdir="${build.ear}"
+ classpath="${app.classpath}"
+ keepgeneric="false"
+ suffix=".jar"/>
+ <include name="**/*ejb-jar.xml" />
+ <exclude name="**/*weblogic-ejb-jar.xml" />
+ </ejbjar>
+ </target>
+
+
+ In the former target, some beans attempt to compile from the
weblogic-ejb-jar,
+ hence they compile incorrectly. I checked many versions of jdk and Ant under
+ both bash and DosPrompt on Mark's system, and I can only assume that this
+ problem is Windows 2000 related. I've never experienced it on my 2 NT
systems
+ with various versions of JDK and Ant. I've checked in new build files, so
+ everyone should update his CVS and be cognizant of this when you work with
+ makefiles.
+
+ Spencer
+
+ A few people have had some odd problems compiling common60 and cscommon using
+ ant. Mark W. will get compilation errors for no good reason. Collin G. will
+ compile things up fine but they won't deploy right.
+
+ I'm not sure these 2 items are related. I have been exhaustively looking
into
+ Mark's issues, and I see no choice but to debug the Ant code, which is
+ available.