Haven't had the time to digest David's paper, my response is completely out of context, sorry for that.
Tim Vernum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That might be a reasonable way to do it, but when you think > about it, there's no reason why a fileset should be defined > as a directory + patternset, a predfined list of files should > be equally usable. Why doesn't includesfile work for you? Stefan
