On 8 May 2001, at 18:02, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> Michael McCallum wrote: > > ... > > And there is no reason to restrict the token replacement to being between @ > > symbols. > > It does not simplify anything is just restricts flexiblity. > > You can't really be saying that restricting Ant's token replacement > doesn't simplify anything, because an Ant that does one kind of token > replacement is clearly simpler than an Ant that does multiple kinds > of token replacement. > > What did you mean to say? What I meant to say is that the complexity is not increased significantly by allowing the setting of the token symbols. :) Its not multiple kinds of token replacement unless you allow chained filtersets. Otherwise its only one but you can set the token symbols. Michael
