Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just checking if the following point is still vetoed?
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------- * It
> should be possible to modify details of the actual build
> (e.g. classpath, used compiler) without the need to change the build
> specification.

I think Conor's point is that this is too vague and without further
details he couldn't agree with it (which I agree with now ;-).  As
I've not seen any clarification, I doubt that anybody has even tried
to challenge this veto yet.

Stefan

Reply via email to