http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1741
*** shadow/1741 Wed May 16 06:03:58 2001
--- shadow/1741.tmp.26852 Fri May 18 07:13:46 2001
***************
*** 2,9 ****
| [PATCH] Ant has a -projecthelp bug and copyFile readonly bug |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bug #: 1741 Product: Ant |
! | Status: NEW Version: 1.3 |
! | Resolution: Platform: All |
| Severity: Normal OS/Version: All |
| Priority: Medium Component: Core tasks |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- 2,9 ----
| [PATCH] Ant has a -projecthelp bug and copyFile readonly bug |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bug #: 1741 Product: Ant |
! | Status: RESOLVED Version: 1.3 |
! | Resolution: WONTFIX Platform: All |
| Severity: Normal OS/Version: All |
| Priority: Medium Component: Core tasks |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
***************
*** 59,62 ****
if (filtering) {
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new FileReader
! (sourceFile));
--- 59,78 ----
if (filtering) {
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new FileReader
! (sourceFile));
!
! ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-05-18 07:13 -------
! The -projecthelp option does not "run" the project and there is therefore no
! guarantee that property values will be set. Whilst that may be true in the
! current implementation it may not be the same in future versions. Therefore I
! do not believe we should apply this patch.
!
! There may be a case for more dynamic help from targets. This is achievable to
! some extent today by the use of a "help" target and an <echo> target.
!
! As for the failure to overwrite read-only files, this will not be changed. If
a
! file is readonly, I don't believe Ant should delete write over it. If you
want
! to delete it you should use an explicit <delete> task prior to the copy.
!
! (BTW, in future, it would be better to raise two bug reports for these issues
! separate so we can take distinct actions. Not necessary fro this case)
